tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9617011.post8892093670607895780..comments2024-03-04T09:44:11.172+01:00Comments on Renewable Music: Sharing: Costs and BenefitsDaniel Wolfhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09093101325234464791noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9617011.post-47457784553892845302011-06-02T07:10:26.781+02:002011-06-02T07:10:26.781+02:00While your sentiment is noble I subscribe to the a...While your sentiment is noble I subscribe to the argument that if we do not accept this form of reasoning for physical goods why should we for intellectual?<br /><br />When you sell a sculpture an "intimate connection" you had with that physical object is forgone. When you release a concept to the public domain the copies of that concept (or conceptual work of art) which resides in both physical form and in the minds of the perceivers is no longer your "property" in any real sense.Doughttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17004539587521303735noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9617011.post-85799879075200782052011-06-01T17:18:31.411+02:002011-06-01T17:18:31.411+02:00I think we gotta get away from letting the value o...I think we gotta get away from letting the value of art be determined by what someone is willing to pay for it. Maybe we need to re-wind back to Bach's era - I don't think he ever sold a single piece, and copyright didn't exist then. Bach was paid for what he was - a good musician - not for what he produced.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com