Sounds articulate precise dimensions in physical space; musical sounds also articulate precise dimensions in social and private spaces.
Use the minimum of resources or means required. Less is often more.
Find the core question or idea in a work. Choose and use your materials to best frame that question or idea.
All musical ideas and all musical instruments (save the vibra-slap) are potentially useful. None is universally useful. (Save the vibra-slap, which is never useful.)
But having practiced the virtues of economy, allow yourself, from time to time, a bit of extravangance, some conspicuous production and consumption.
Go to extremes, in whichever parameter you use, including extremes of moderation.
Question parameters. A parameter is someone else's way of dividing up the aural experience. Explore the edges and boundaries of and between pitch and timbre and rhythm and dynamic and form. Explore and break boundaries between music and not-music.
Music, the physics of musical sound, the psychophysics of music, and the neuroscience of music are different concerns, each with its own territory and terminology. How might they relate? How might they not relate? What unique elements of cohesion does music bring to these disciplines and how can they extend the potential for new forms of musical activity?
Follow an idea in all its consequences. Find the end of a process or pattern. Push a system to its design capacity and then push beyond it.
However, if the consequences of a process are obvious, is it necessary to carry out the process in full?
Consider the possibility of multiple versions, or realizations, of a work. Or accept the first version and move on to the next work without looking (listening) back.
Break, subvert, or invert cause and effect.
Complexity can be defined in numerous ways. A universally applicable and acceptable definition of either "sufficient" or "over-" complexity is impossible. (To paraphrase Potter Stewart, you know it when you hear it). When people make and listen to music, one form or another of complexity is inevitable. Don't give it a second thought.
Every piece of music has an element of the improvisational, extemporaneous, accidental, capricious, prejudiced or arbitrary. Is a piece of music interesting because of this?
Experiment with scale, both the smallest, most local, and the grandest, most global, as well as the most anonymous quantities in-between.
Boredom is only a function of time, and a function with several variables.
Modest work done in a serious way, leavened with levity, can carry large ambitions.
History is both a playground and a minefield, and a composer writes and rewrites music history with reckless disregard for the difference between a playground and a minefield.
ok, I think you need to get more outside on weekends
Really well-written, and very thought-provoking. I particularly agree with the credo that "Less is often more," and the idea that music, whether or not it is written, often contradicts itself in performance.
Post a Comment